In the digital age, the use of emojis has become entrenched in every-day communications as a means to say more with less. This form of communication has recently been recognised by a Canadian court in South West Terminal Ltd v Achter Land & Cattle  as binding within the context of contractual negotiations. The Court set a precedence whereby it recognised that the use of a ‘thumbs-up’ emoji sent via a mobile text message was a valid form of acceptance of a contractual offer.
The decision is not binding on Australian courts, however it may offer a persuasive argument should it be tested, particularly in a society which is ever evolving toward the automation and digitalisation of legal transactions.
In its decision, the Canadian court addressed the obvious concerns in relation to the vast interpretations of emojis (and their intended use) by stating:
“courts will have to be ready to meet the new challenges that may arise from the use of emojis and the like.”
The case demonstrates the court’s willingness to adapt to the modernisation of communications and otherwise highlights the importance of language and expression whilst negotiating contracts or other legal transactions. Individuals and businesses should be careful to use any forms of communication which may be misinterpreted and be mindful of using clear and unambiguous language.
Whilst Australia is yet to determine such a case, it will undoubtedly arise in the future as society evolves and adapts to technological advancements. Given the variety of possible interpretations associated with expressive emojis, it would not be surprising that these issues will arise in future employment, defamation or domestic violence matters.
If you would like to discuss any of the above with our team, please contact us today.
The information provided in this article is for general information and educative purposes in summary form on legal topics which is current at the time it is published. The content does not constitute legal advice or recommendations and should not be relied upon as such. Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation of this article, FC Lawyers cannot accept responsibility for any errors, including those caused by negligence, in the material. We make no representations, statements or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information and you should not rely on it. You are advised to make your own independent inquiries regarding the accuracy of any information provided on this website. FC Lawyers does not guarantee, and accepts no legal responsibility whatsoever arising from or in connection to the accuracy, reliability, currency, correctness or completeness of any material contained in this article. Links to third party websites or articles does not constitute any endorsement or approval of those sites or the owners of those sites. Nothing in this article should be construed as granting any licence or right for you to use that content. You should consult the third party’s terms and conditions of use in relation to any third-party content. FC Lawyers disclaims all responsibility and all liability (including liability for negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and costs you might incur as a result of the information being inaccurate or incomplete in any way. Appropriate legal advice should always be obtained in actual situations.
Prefer to get in touch?
With offices in Brisbane, Sunshine Coast and Sydney, our team is well equipped to provide both advice and support across a broad range of legal areas.