I recently read the case of Hodgson v Amcor Ltd; Amcor Ltd & Ors v Barnes & Ors  VSC 94 which addressed a number of key principles of redundancy.
Hodgson had been employed by Amcor Ltd for 38 years and was made redundant by the company at age 61. His annual remuneration package was as follows:
- Base salary;
- Housing allowance;
- Motor vehicle allowance;
- Total remuneration sum of $750,000.00.
No period of notice in the event of redundancy was specified in Hodgson’s employment contract; however, Amcor Ltd had a company Redundancy Policy which applied to all employees.
Amcor’s Redundancy Policy
The Redundancy policy expressly applied to senior management and all staff members.
It stated that all redundant employees were entitled to be paid three weeks base salary for each completed year of continuous service. The maximum under the redundancy policy was 52 weeks pay.
The Supreme Court held that this policy formed part of Hodgson’s employment contract.
The Supreme Court of Victoria ruled that Hodgson had not been made genuinely redundant because the restructure of the company did not cause his role to be modified sufficiently enough to fundamentally change the nature of his position. Further, there was an insufficient redistribution of Hodgson’s job functions.
Accordingly, Amcor was order to pay a total of $917,695.00 to Hodgson which included payment in lieu of notice, accrued annual leave and long service leave. The order also included a bonus payment of $160,000.00 which Hodgson would have receive had his employment not been terminated.
The Supreme Court of Victoria drew some key findings about redundancy in this case which should be kept in mind:
- A job becomes redundant only when the employer no longer requires to have the job performed by anyone; (or)
- For all practical purposes the duties of the job have changed so in effect the original role no longer exists; (or)
- The Employer is required to redistribute the duties of the job among other employees which means that in effect the original role ceases to exist.
It is very important when considering terminating an employee, that you carefully consider your legal position. It is usually important to consider these issues when preparing employee agreements.
Please contact me if you have any questions in regards to redundancy and employment agreements.
The information provided in this article is for general information and educative purposes in summary form on legal topics which is current at the time it is published. The content does not constitute legal advice or recommendations and should not be relied upon as such. Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation of this article, FC Lawyers cannot accept responsibility for any errors, including those caused by negligence, in the material. We make no representations, statements or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information and you should not rely on it. You are advised to make your own independent inquiries regarding the accuracy of any information provided on this website. FC Lawyers does not guarantee, and accepts no legal responsibility whatsoever arising from or in connection to the accuracy, reliability, currency, correctness or completeness of any material contained in this article. Links to third party websites or articles does not constitute any endorsement or approval of those sites or the owners of those sites. Nothing in this article should be construed as granting any licence or right for you to use that content. You should consult the third party’s terms and conditions of use in relation to any third-party content. FC Lawyers disclaims all responsibility and all liability (including liability for negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and costs you might incur as a result of the information being inaccurate or incomplete in any way. Appropriate legal advice should always be obtained in actual situations.